此次苏州环球教育老师为大家奉上2018年7月28日雅思写作Task 2题目解析及完整范文，供烤鸭们参考~

　　Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.

　　To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　逻辑关系是：ex-prisoners -阻止青少年犯罪（ the teenagers from convicting a crime）

　　直接逻辑关系：reformed offenders所以➡speak from experience➡tell young people about how they became involved in crime, how dangerous the criminal lifestyle could be and what life in prison could be like➡dispel ideas of teenagers about the glamorous lives that criminals can hav➡be keen to hear the stories of the ex-offenders➡ shocking nature of the stories could have positive effects on the adolescents.

　　逻辑关系还可以是：alternatives to using reformed criminals-不能阻止青少年犯罪（be much less effective）

　　直接逻辑关系：police officers ➡visit schools and talk to young people ➡details about what happens to lawbreakers when they are caught➡examples include imprisonment or fining or death sentence?boring and reluctant to take advice.

　　直接逻辑关系：school teachers ➡speak to their students about crimes ➡fail to act as credible sources of information➡less likely to be influential on the teenagers

　　在看到题目时，理顺题干本身的逻辑关系非常重要，环球教育教研团队早早的将题目的逻辑类型都给“烤鸭”们理好，参加过培训的小伙伴，速速留言，分享你关于本题的逻辑关系吧，期待本次考试的成绩出来，大家都一次通过，附上本文完整范文如下：

　　It is true that ex-prisoners can become normal, productive members of society.I completely agree with the idea that allowing such people to speak to teenagers about their experiences is the best way to discourage them from breaking the law.

　　In my opinion, teenagers are more likely to accept advice from someone who can speak from experience. Reformed offenders can tell young people about how they became involved in crime, the dangers of a criminal lifestyle, and what life in prison is really like. They can also dispel any ideas that teenagers may have about criminals leading glamorous lives. While adolescents are often indifferent to the guidance given by older people, I imagine that most of them would be extremely keen to hear the stories of an ex-offender. The vivid and perhaps shocking nature of these stories is likely to have a powerful impact.

　　The alternatives to using reformed criminals to educate teenagers about crime would be much less effective. One option would be for police officers to visit schools and talk to young people. This could be useful in terms of informing teens about what happens to lawbreakers when they are caught, but young people are often reluctant to take advice from figures of authority. A second option would be for school teachers to speak to their students about crime, but I doubt that students would see teachers as credible sources of information about this topic. Finally, educational films might be informative, but there would be no opportunity for young people to interact and ask questions.

　　In conclusion, I fully support the view that people who have turned their lives around after serving a prison sentence could help to deter teenagers from committing crimes.