苏州环球教育杨晓娟老师对11月1日的雅思写作大小作文进行了专业点评，并给出了大作文的范本→_→

　　A类小作文

　　【作文类型】柱状图

　　【作文题目】The bar chart shows the average time spent on playing video games by those aged between 16 and 22 years old.

　　【作文图片】

　　【综合点评】 动态柱状图。年轻人玩游戏在四个国家两个时间段的比较。按照trend的种类进行分段总结，在size 上面进行比较。注意语法的多样性和准确性，可以参考的时态有一般过去时，过去完成时等。

　　A类大作文

　　【作文题目】Public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free for the people who use it. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

　　【题目分析】同意与否类。参考题目为C8T3，交通污染问题的解决；C11T1 railway 和roads 的拨款。题干中含有因果逻辑关系，注意写作时需要阐明原因和结论的逻辑关系.

　　【题材类别】社会类

　　【参考范文】

　　The perfection of infrastructures, especially the diverse traffic means, has always been supported in different countries by a range of monetary sources. It has been said that it should be the local council rather than individuals who should pay for the establishment of such services. I personally believe that it is a good idea for the authorities to do this due to the benefits this practice can bring.

　　The obvious argument in its favor is that this development may contribute to a better off living standard for the general public. This is because affluently financed  and thus well furnished and fully maintained buses，subways or sky trains could entice increasing number of commuters to tour around by cars, because of the free and sound service. This may save them loads of money that may otherwise be used on charges of petrol and oil if they drive their own cars, thus having more disposable income to be spent on enhancing the living condition, education and medical care.

　　An additional reason for this would be the contribution this could do for the environmental protection. It is the free public transportation that attracts more people to commute on the road without driving their own cars. This means that less tail gases would be generated, thus  reducing the carbon footprint and protecting the atmosphere.

　　（However, we cannot be oblivious to the drawbacks of free traffic services. Obviously, this development may add more financial burden to the people involved. For example, in Beijing, if it were not for the low charges of bus lines， there would not have been so much fiscal burden for the tax payers, as the construction of the subways and maintenance of main roads for buses is often to blame for the huge debt, thus defying their living standard and the environmental protection. However, this situation seldom occurs. If more money were spent on the public traffic, tax payers may spend less time commuting and even can do some e-contacting with their workmates. This means their working efficiency can be improved because they do not have to be entangled with driving on the road, thus increasing their productivity and their income level. 可以略去-让步反驳段仅供参考）

　　In conclusion, there is no doubt that budget of governments can be limited so that the fund for traffic may arouse some inconvenience for tax payers, but this could be outweighed by the potential enhancement in the income level, the working efficiency, the living standard and the air quality.